Promotion in academic rank is recognition of past achievement of the faculty member being considered for promotion. In addition, promotion in rank is usually recognition of future potential and a sign of confidence that the individual is capable of greater accomplishments and of assuming greater responsibilities. It is the policy of Tennessee Technological University to make promotions primarily on considerations of merit, tempered by considerations of institutional mission and fiscal responsibility. In maintaining this policy, promotions are made objectively, equitably, impartially, and as recognition of merit in accordance with the criteria contained in this policy.
For the purpose of this policy, teaching, research/scholarship/creative activity, and service/outreach will be defined as follows:
Teaching applies to any strategy in which information is imparted so that others may learn, and may include, but is not limited to, a variety of techniques including instruction, mentoring, development of course materials or courseware, and development of innovative approaches to instruction.
B. Research/Scholarship/Creative Activity
Research/scholarship/creative activity applies to the studious inquiry, examination or discovery that contributes to disciplinary and interdisciplinary bodies of knowledge. Research/scholarship/creative activity may include, but is not limited to, disciplinary and interdisciplinary activities that focus on the boundaries of knowledge, field-based scholarship, creative activities (e.g., film-making, performances, or other artistic creations), and the development of innovative approaches to teaching (pedagogical research).
Service/outreach applies to involvement within the community as defined by the University’s role and mission; service to the University; and service within the bounds of the applicant’s academic discipline and budgeted assignment.
A more detailed description of these activities and the criteria to be applied in assessing performance in these three areas may be found in Section IV. of the Tennessee Technological University Policy on Academic Tenure and in Section VII. of this policy on Faculty Promotion.
The Promotion Procedures and Forms List, Tennessee Technological University, covers the evaluation process for faculty promotion as required in Section III. of Board Policy 5:02:02:20. http://www.tbr.state.tn.us/policies/default.aspx?id=1474
The importance of the criteria for a recommendation for appointment to or promotion in academic rank depend upon the nature, mission, and goals of the University and of the academic department/unit in which the candidate is to obtain appointment or promotion. Recommendations for appointment or promotion, subject to the requirements of this policy, shall devolve from the professional judgment of the peers in the academic department/unit in which the candidate is to obtain appointment or promotion, those departmental/unit peers acting as that segment of the wider community of scholars best qualified to evaluate the potential or actual performance of the candidate in the exercise of his/her professional responsibilities.
All full-time faculty members are expected to engage in teaching, research/scholarship/ creative activity, and service/outreach, but not all are expected to engage in each activity to the same degree. The mission statement of Tennessee Technological University clearly accords the highest priority to teaching, followed by research/scholarship/creative activity and service/outreach, in that order. However, there is a wide variation in individual academic unit missions and priorities. Even within units, faculty assignments may vary substantially with workload assignments and considerations of faculty abilities, interests and University needs. Because individual priorities, workloads, the level and quality of support services and facilities, disciplinary characteristics, and faculty capabilities and interests are all subject to wide variation within the University, an effective system for evaluating potential or performance must be based upon the professional judgment of the faculty members in the candidate's academic department/unit.
The departmental/unit peers shall evaluate the appropriateness of the candidate’s training, degrees, and prior professional experience. Equivalent prior professional experience may include relevant instructional experience, experience as an administrator, counselor, librarian, or the like. In evaluating prior professional experience, the President shall determine, upon the recommendation of the departmental/unit peers, whether prior service at another institution shall be accepted entirely, or shall be discounted in whole or in part.
The following are criteria that distinguish between academic ranks:
B. Assistant Professor
C. Associate Professor
The minimum rank qualifications should be met in every recommendation regarding appointment to academic rank and for promotion in academic rank. Exceptions to the minimum rank qualifications can be recommended by the departmental/unit peers and by the President of the University; however, such exceptions are not favored and should be granted only upon a showing of a candidate's exceptional merit and/or other extraordinary circumstances, such as an objective need to deviate from these minimum qualifications in filling positions and/or retaining otherwise qualified faculty within certain academic disciplines.
Petitions for exceptions to promotional criteria may include consideration of the appropriateness of the degree or extraordinary qualities that the candidate may possess. The equivalent work experience credit may include relevant teaching experience or other experiences such as experience gained as an administrator, counselor, librarian, or the like. When evaluating college level instruction, research/scholarship/creative activities, and service/outreach, the university may make its own determination whether or not the number of years of experience from another university is to be accepted in total or discounted in some manner.
The Board uses national discipline standards to determine which degrees are considered to be “terminal” within a discipline. The University may request blanket exceptions to these standards by classification based upon the University’s mission and hiring practice. The University may also petition the Board for “equivalent work experience credit” when a candidate has not obtained a terminal degree, but has a record of extraordinary achievement in a given field. The equivalent work experience credit may include relevant teaching experience or other related experiences.
Degrees considered terminal by the Board of Regents include:
NOTE: National practice does not recognize the J.D. as a doctorate.
All full-time faculty members are expected to engage in teaching, research/scholarship/ creative activity, and service/outreach, but not all are expected to engage in each activity to the same degree nor is each individual expected to be engaged in all aspects of each activity. It must further be noted that some overlap among these related activities is to be expected. The departmental/unit peers have the primary responsibility for evaluating the quality of faculty performance relative to appointment to or promotion in academic rank.
The following descriptions of these professional activities shall be used as general guidelines in evaluating a candidate's potential (in cases of appointment) or performance (in cases of promotion).
Teaching may consist of a combination of the following professional activities:
B. Research/Scholarship/Creative Activity
Research/scholarship/creative activity includes those professional activities designed to discover, create, or disseminate greater knowledge, appreciation, or understanding of an academic discipline, including, but not limited to:
Evaluation of the candidate's research/scholarship/creative activity should stress the quality of the documented work, and should be based on the professional judgment of peers in the discipline. Documentation of these activities should manifest ability in the candidate's discipline. Some methods of documenting this evaluation include, but are not limited to, publication of articles in refereed journals, publication of books by recognized presses, proprietary research, production of juried artistic works, presentation of refereed papers at professional meetings, obtaining competitive grants from professional agencies, or similar means.
Service/outreach includes those activities undertaken in service to the community, the University, the higher education profession as a whole, and the faculty member's academic discipline, including:
D. General Process Guidelines at University Level
So that the decision process can be as objective as possible, each recommendation (forwarded from the academic department/unit to a higher administrative level in the University) should be accompanied by complete and careful documentation of the candidate’s teaching performance, and/or research/scholarship/creative activity, and/or service/outreach contributions. Although the areas of teaching, research/ scholarship/creative activity, and service/outreach are all considered important, certain exceptions may exist where evaluation may occur in one or the other area exclusively. In these cases, as well as in the general case, appropriate supervisory personnel shall clearly and adequately document the facts that justify the individual's promotion. The initiating academic department/unit may, if deemed desirable, include information relative to the candidate's research/scholarship/creative activity, publication record, exceptional administrative performance, or other types of contributions. The University may use additional procedures with approval of the Tennessee Board of Regents.
E. General Process Guidelines at Board Level
The President of the University should forward a list of promotional recommendations to the Chancellor for his/her review. The Chancellor's recommendation will be forwarded to the Committee on Personnel and the Committee's recommendation forwarded to the Board.
F. Appeals of Promotion Decisions
Should a faculty member be dissatisfied with the decision respecting his/her promotion at any point in the promotion process, up to, but not including the recommendation of the President to the Chancellor, he/she may appeal that decision through the Faculty Affairs Committee, and/or the Tennessee Technological University Grievance Policy or a committee specifically empowered by the President to handle such appeals. Should a faculty member be dissatisfied with the decision respecting his/her promotion made by the President or the Chancellor, he/she may appeal to the next level, culminating in the Board.
[Approved by the University Faculty April 27, 2005]