|
A simple technique used in 12th century Italy to authenticate high quality
paper has met 21st century researchers trying to protect the authentication
and copyright of digital files through digital watermarking.
It's the digital equivalent to holding a photo, video or music file up
to the light to see whether or not it is authentic or has been altered.
P.K. Rajan, a Tennessee Tech University electrical and computer engineering
professor, has taken up the challenge of refining the technique so that
copyrighted digital photos, videos or music files can be more effectively
watermarked without distortion and so that files can be easily identified
as authentic.
"Copyright and authentication are huge issues in this digital age
where we produce and transmit so many photos, sound files and other works
digitally," said Rajan. "We want improve the level of protection
of these works because there are potential serious consequences when digital
files are used without authorization or authenticity is compromised.
"For instance, if a forensic specialist takes a digital photo of
a murder scene that is entered into evidence, jurors need some reassurance
that the photo hasn't been modified in any way with software that's in
common use," he said. "In this case, we need a watermark that
allows acceptable manipulation, like resizing, without allowing alteration.
Currently, digital photography is considered "untrustworthy"
since it is so easy to edit."
Rajan's example refers to one of the two categories of current problems
addressed by the digital watermarking research community— robust
watermarks for copyright security and fragile watermarks for authentication
of images. Watermarking can be used for copyright security because it
allows a hidden tag that says "This belongs to..." to be inserted
into the data in an invisible manner. The watermark is robust so that
the watermark cannot be deleted without destroying the image itself.
"Removing a robust code is like removing an ink-filled security
device on a piece of clothing without the proper device," said Rajan.
"You cannot remove either without destroying the product.
"On the other hand, fragile watermarks are designed to be broken
when the file is altered so that you can detect if a file has been altered
in a significant way," he said.
To be effective, a watermark must be embedded in the perceptually most
significant portions of an image or in the most identifiable audio or
video portions of a file, but it is difficult to embed a watermark in
such important places that does not distort the original image or sound.
The watermark bits must be scattered in these most significant portions
of the image or music in such a way that they cannot be seen or changed.
Rajan, assisted by undergraduate students David Cook and Jameson Porter,
supported by an NSF Research Experience for Undergraduates in Network
and Communication Systems Site grant, worked on this project last summer.
He and Cook presently focus on developing a new layered watermarking algorithm
that improves the localization accuracy of the watermark, meaning you
can more precisely detect which part of the image has been modified.
They want to combine this high accuracy of detecting the watermark with
a public-key encryption system. Public-key encryption is used heavily
in "digital signatures" that verify who sent the file; the person
receiving it does not have to have any special software or equipment to
read the signature, but the receiver cannot alter it.
"Simply, we want to retain the ability to detect tiny changes while
also retaining the security offered by public-key encryption," explained
Rajan. "Public-key encryption is important since it allows the decryption
of the data without having to publish the encrypting key. That is, the
security of the key need not be compromised to allow the authentication
of only one image.
--Karen Lykins
This information posted 10 APRIL 2006
|