ACADEMIC
REGULATIONS
THE UNIVERSITY
CATALOG is the official guide for students, faculty and staff at Tennessee Technological
University. It contains admission requirements, registration procedures, academic
regulations, descriptions of the major programs of study, student services and
activities, a directory of the faculty and administrators, etc. Students are
responsible for acquainting themselves with the information, and they should
follow it carefully throughout their college career.
The Undergraduate
Catalog is available online at http://www.tntech.edu/ugcat.
If you have any questions relating to academic regulations and procedures, please
refer to the University Catalog.
| 1.
|
The
Eagle Card. Every student receives the first Eagle Card
(official TTU ID) free of charge. Replacements
are available for a $10 fee.
Eagle Cards
are used as key access to Residential Life halls. Cards are encoded
with meal plans and flex dollars. General cash on the card may be used
in the Mini-Mart, Bookstore, Cafeteria, Perch, and Swoops Grill.
The Eagle
Card is used for admission to the Fitness Center, student activities,
and athletic events. Students must present this card upon request from
any college official or be subject to disciplinary action. |
| 2. |
Academic
Advisement takes place prior to registration. Each student is assigned
an academic advisor who will assist in planning the program of study. The
semester Schedule of Classes, available in the Office of Records and Registration,
provides detailed instructions for registration. It’s helpful to have
prepared a trial schedule prior to the appointment with the academic advisor. |
| 3. |
Class
Attendance. Please refer to the Official University Catalog. |
| 4.
|
Retention
Table. Please refer to the Official University Catalog.
Readmission After Suspension. Please refer to the Official University
Catalog.
Appeal.
Please refer to the Official University Catalog.
Academic
Development Program. Please refer to the Official University
Catalog.
|
| 5.
|
Course
Syllabi and Grading Policy Statement. A written course syllabus
and grading policy statement shall be prepared by faculty for each course
offered, as a benefit for student participation and expectations. The
syllabus and grading policy statement shall be submitted either in writing
to enrolled students during the first class period or posted on the web
before the first class period.
The written
course syllabus and grading policy statement shall contain the following: |
| |
(1) |
Instructor’s
name, office number, and phone number. |
| |
(2) |
Office hours. |
| |
(3) |
Course discipline
and title. |
| |
(4) |
Prerequisites
(if applicable). |
| |
(5) |
Texts and
References. |
| |
(6) |
List of objectives. |
| |
(7) |
Major teaching
methods (which might include, but would not be limited to: lectures, labs,
demonstrations, discussion, reading, or written assignments). |
| |
(8) |
Special instructional
materials (which might include, but would not be limited to: lab notebook,
drafting equipment, knife, computer disks or programs, calculators, fees,
etc.). |
| |
(9) |
Topics to
be covered. |
| |
(10) |
Grading and
evaluation procedures. |
| |
(11) |
Expanded statement
of the University plagiarism policy if appropriate. |
| |
(12) |
Statement
of attendance policy. |
| |
(13) |
Any additional
information the instructor may wish to include. A written course syllabus
and grading policy statement for each course shall be on file in the departmental
office. |
| 6. |
Tests
and Examinations. In accordance with accepted norms of academic
freedom and responsibility, Tennessee Technological University recognizes
that primary responsibility for the preparation, scope, security, and
administration of examinations rests with the faculty.
The following
guidelines are provided to address specific issues: |
| |
(1) |
Exams should not be prepared, reproduced, or graded by student workers
without the express
consent and direct supervision by appropriate faculty or staff. |
| |
(2) |
Faculty
should exercise discretion with respect to repetition of specific test materials
to avoid
unfair advantage for students with access to previous exams. |
| |
(3) |
Faculty
are encouraged to be present during the administration of an exam. If the
faculty
member must be absent, he/she should arrange, if possible, for a colleague
with expertise
in the content area to administer the exam. Consultation is encouraged between
faculty and students who believe themselves to have been disadvantaged by
the absence
of the faculty. |
| |
(4) |
Faculty
may, at their discretion, permit a student with an unusually demanding schedule
to take
an exam at an alternate time. |
| |
(5) |
Final
examinations are to be held in all courses at the close of the semester
in which the courses
are taught and are to be administered according to the schedule printed
in the Bulletin.
Departments retain the authority to exempt classes from this requirement.
For faculty
members faced with unusual situations or the necessity of being away from
campus on official University business, examination schedules can be revised
upon the recommendation
of the departmental chairperson and approved by the academic dean involved.
Special efforts should be made to avoid undue difficulties for students
affected
by such changes. |
| |
(6) |
No
examination or extensive assignments should be given during the week prior
to final examinations
except
(1) quizzes
covering no more than a week’s worth of new material,
(2) major tests unanimously requested by the class,
(3) approved final examinations, and
(4) evaluation in laboratories, independent study, or self-paced courses.
During regular
semesters, at least one day will intervene between the last class meeting
day and the
first scheduled final examination for that class. |
| 7. |
Midterm
Grades. The University recognizes that early warnings are beneficial
for students having difficulty in a course. We commend those faculty members
who encourage individual or group help sessions and recommend tutorial laboratories.
We recommend that faculty members structure
and clearly define the grading system in order that students can determine
by mid-term their
level of performance. We further recommend that faculty members, whenever
possible, contact
students at mid-term who are performing poorly and offer assistance and
suggestions for
improvement. One component of the University’s efforts to improve
retention involves the implementation
of a policy whereby all students having completed fewer than 30 hours of
credit will
receive a “Freshman Progress Report” for the courses in which
they are currently enrolled, a
copy of which will be sent to the student’s advisor. A general outline
of the proposed procedure
is shown below. |
| |
(1) |
Each
instructor is required to enter on the computer midterm progress reports
for students who have completed fewer than 30 semester hours of academic
credit. Check the university calendar for Midterm Reporting dates in the
Schedule of Classes Bulletin or on the web at http://www.tntech.edu/www/admin/ugcat/calendar.html.
|
| |
(2) |
Instructors
will indicate whether the student’s progress at Midterm was satisfactory
(S = A, B,
or C) or unsatisfactory (U = D or F). It is assumed that each instructor
will be readily able
to assess whether or not a student’s progress was satisfactory. It
is also assumed that
faculty advisors will make efforts to use this information to assist the
student. Midterm Progress
Reports or lack thereof may not be used as an issue in a grade appeal. |
| |
(3) |
Students
will be notified via campus email of the date they can access their Midterm
Progress Reports. Students can then view their progress reports by going
to http://www.tntech.edu and
clicking on the Eagle Online-Apply Online-Grades link. |
| |
(4) |
Faculty
Advisors can log into TTUMIS system to obtain an online report of their
advisees Midterm
Progress Reports. Printouts will also be distributed to the Departmental
Chairpersons
and College Deans after Midterm Progress Reporting period is finalized. |
| |
For
more specific instructions or information concerning Midterm Progress Reporting,
please
contact the Office of Records & Registration located in Derryberry Hall,
Room 102. |
| 8. |
Plagiarism.
When you use (for example, quote or even summarize or paraphrase) someone
else’s media, words, data, ideas, or other works, you must cite your
source. You should be especially careful to avoid plagiarizing Internet
sources (for example, e-mail, chat rooms, Web sites, or discussion groups).
It does not matter whether you borrow material from print sources, from
the Internet, from on-line data bases, or from interviews. Failure to cite
your source is plagiarism. Students who plagiarize may receive an “F”
or a “0” for the assignment,
or an “F" for the course. |
| 9. |
Week
Prior To Final Examinations. |
| |
A.
University-approved social and extracurricular activities should be curtailed.
B. No examination
or extensive assignments should be given during the week prior to final
examinations
except as follows: |
| |
(1) |
Quizzes
covering no more than a week’s worth of new material. |
| |
(2) |
Major
tests unanimously requested by the class. |
| |
(3) |
Approved
final examinations. |
| |
(4) |
Evaluation
in laboratories, independent study, or self-paced courses. |
| |
C.
During regular semesters, at least one day should intervene between the
last class meeting day and the first scheduled final examination for that
class. |
| 10. |
Grade
Appeal Procedures. |
| |
The
grade appeal procedures represent the official policy for each faculty
member. These procedures:
A. Recognize
the right of each student to receive a grade assigned upon a fair and
unprejudiced evaluation
based on a method that is not arbitrary or capricious.
B. Recognize
the right of each student to review with the instructor all work used
in the evaluation.
C. Provide
any student who has evidence that a mistake has been made in calculating
or recording
his or her grade or that his or her grade has been assigned based on arbitrary
or
capricious deviation from the instructor’s stated grading policy
the opportunity to seek redress.
D. Recognize
the instructor’s right to assign a grade based on any method that
is professionally acceptable,
submitted in writing to everyone in the class, and applied equally to
all members
of the class. |
| |
An
appeal of a grade shall progress as follows:
Step
One: The student must consult with the course instructor in an
attempt to understand the instructor’s justification for the grade
and to resolve the disagreement in an informal, cooperative atmosphere.
For fall semester grades, this consultation must occur by the end of the fifteenth class day of the succeeding spring semester. For spring and summer semester grades, the consultation must occur by the end of the fifteenth class day of the succeeding fall semester. Only if the instructor is on leave or no longer employed by the university may the student begin with Step Two.
Step
Two: If a resolution is not reached in Step One, the student
may proceed to Step Two. Within five business days after consulting with
the instructor, the student shall present the complaint in writing to
the chair of the department in which the grade was assigned. The written
appeal shall state the student’s specific request (e.g., to change
a final grade from F to C) and the grounds for the request. Supporting
evidence such as the course syllabus, policy sheet, and copies of graded
assignments (when available) shall be included with the written appeal.
The departmental
chair should ensure that the requirements of Step One have been satisfied
prior to acting on the appeal. Within seven business days after receiving
the appeal and supporting evidence, the departmental chair shall meet
jointly with the student
and the instructor in an attempt to resolve the dispute. The
chair may also consult separately with the student and the instructor.
If, in the opinion
of the chair, the student’s appeal lacks merit, the chair shall
so notify the student
and the instructor in writing within three business days after the chair’s
joint consultation
with the student and the instructor. If, in the opinion of the chair,
the instructor
assigned the grade in a manner not in accordance with University policy
(See
items C and D above), the chair shall recommend to the instructor in writing
that
the grade be changed. The recommendation from the chair shall be made
within
three business days after the joint consultation withthe student and the
instructor.
The instructor shall, within three business days after receiving the chair’s
recommendation,
provide a written response to the chair. Within three business days
after receiving the instructor’s written response, the chair shall
communicate the
status of the appeal to the student and the instructor.
Step
Three: If the appeal is not resolved in Step Two, the student
may, within five business days
after receiving the notification from the departmental chair, appeal to
the dean of
the college in which the course is taught. The dean shall notify in writing
the chair
and the instructor that an appeal has been made to the dean’s level.
All documents
submitted in Step Two, together with additional written statements from
the
student, the instructor, and the chair regarding the appeal as each sees
it shall be transmitted
to the dean. Within seven business days after receiving the appeal and
supporting
evidence, the dean shall meet in joint consultation with the student,
the instructor,
and the chair. The dean may also consult separately with the student,
the instructor,
and the chair. If the chair and the dean concur that the student’s
request lacks
merit, the appeal ends and the student has no further recourse under these
procedures.
The dean
shall so inform the student, the instructor, and the chair in writing
within three business days after the joint consultation with the student,
the instructor, and the chair. If, in the opinion of the dean, the instructor
assigned the grade in a manner not in accordance with University policy
(See items C and D above), the dean shall recommend
to the instructor in writing that the grade be changed. The recommendation
from the dean shall be made within three business days after the joint
consultation with the student, the instructor, and the chair. The instructor
shall, within
three business days after receiving the dean’s recommendation, provide
a written
response to the dean. Within three business days after receiving the instructor’s
decision, the dean shall communicate the status of the appeal to the student,
the instructor, and the chair.
Step
Four: If the appeal is not resolved or dismissed in Step Three,
the student may appeal to the Vice President for Academic Affairs. The
appeal shall be made within five business days after the student receives
notification from the dean in Step Three.
The vice
president shall notify the instructor, the chair, and the dean of the
appeal. All
documents submitted in Step Three shall be forwarded to the vice president.
Within seven
business days after receiving the supporting documents, the vice president
shall meet in joint consultation with the student, the instructor, the
chair, and the dean. The vice president may also consult separately with
the student, the instructor, the chair, and the dean. If, after reviewing
the appeal and consulting with the parties involved, the vice president
determines that the student’s appeal lacks merit, and if this opinion
is in concurrence with at least one of the two administrators who previously
heard the appeal, the appeal ends and the student has no further recourse
under these procedures. The student, the instructor, the chair, and the
dean shall be so informed in writing within three business days after
the joint consultation with the parties involved. If the vice president
determines that
the student’s appeal lacks merit, and if this opinion differs from
that of both administrators
who previously heard the appeal, the vice president shall recommend
to the president of the University that the appeal be submitted to the
chair
of the Academic Council, who will form a Grade Appeal Committee to address
the case. (See Step Five). The student, the instructor, the chair, and
the dean
shall be so informed in writing within five business days after the joint
consultation
with the parties involved. If, in the opinion of the vice president, the
instructor
assigned the grade in a manner not in accordance with University policy
(See
items C and D above), the vice president shall recommend to the instructor
in
writing that the grade be changed. The recommendation from the vice president
shall be made within three business days after the joint consultation
with the
student, the instructor, the chair, and the dean. The instructor shall,
within three
business days after receiving the vice president’s recommendation,
provide a written
response to the vice president. Within five business days after receiving
the instructor’s
response, the vice president shall communicate in writing the status of
the
appeal to the student, the instructor, the chair, and the dean. If the
appeal is not
resolved, the vice president shall recommend to the president of the University
that
the appeal be submitted to the chair of the Academic Council, who will
form a Grade
Appeal Committee to address the case. (See Step Five.)
Step
Five: If the president refers the appeal to the chair of the
Academic Council, he or she shall do so within three business days after
receiving the recommendation from the vice president. The chair of the
Academic Council shall appoint a Grade Appeal Committee. This committee
shall be composed of three members of the Academic Council not in the
same department as the instructor involved in the grade appeal and two
members of the Academic Council from the instructor’s department.
If there are fewer than two representatives on the Academic Council from
the instructor’s department, then the chair of the Academic Council
shall appoint a faculty member or members from the department represented
by the instructor involved in the appeal. If the appeal involves the chair
of the Academic Council, then the chair of the Administrative Council
shall appoint the committee and serve as its chair; otherwise, the chair
of the Academic Council also chairs the Grade Appeal Committee. The members
of the committee should meet the approval of both the instructor and the
student. If an adequate number of acceptable committee members cannot
be found, the Vice President for Academic Affairs shall appoint the committee.
The chair of the Grade Appeal Committee shall notify the student, the
instructor, the departmental chair, the dean, and the Vice President for
Academic Affairs that the appeal has been referred to the Grade Appeal
Committee. All materials from Step Four shall be forwarded to committee
members. The committee shall meet within seven business days after the
chair of the Academic Council receives the appeal request and supporting
evidence. The instructor and the student shall be allowed to present their
positions to the committee. If the committee determines that the appeal
lacks merit, the appeal ends and the student has no further recourse under
these procedures. The chair of the committee shall notify in writing the
student, the instructor, the departmental chair, the dean, and the vice
president of the committee’s decision. If the committee determines
that the instructor assigned the grade in a manner not in accordance with
University policy (See items C and D above), the committee shall either
approve the student’s request or modify it in accordance with the
committee’s findings. The committee chair shall notify the instructor
in writing of the committee’s decision within three business days.
The instructor shall then have seven business days to respond to the committee’s
decision. If the committee’s decision is that the student’s
grade should be changed and the instructor agrees to change the grade,
he or she shall complete a Change of Grade Form and submit it to the Records
Office. If the instructor declines to change the grade, the chair of the
Grade Appeal Committee shall communicate the committee’s decision
and the instructor’s response to the president of the University,
who shall, if he or she concurs with the decision of the Grade Appeal
Committee, notify the Records Office that the grade is to be changed.
The chair of the Grade Appeal Committee shall notify in writing the student,
the instructor, the departmental chair, the dean, and the Vice President
for Academic Affairs of the disposition of the appeal. If the instructor
involved in a grade appeal is a departmental chair or dean, the student
may, after fully complying with Step One, submit his or her written appeal
directly to the Vice President for Academic Affairs. The vice president
shall appoint an administrator to perform the grade appeal duties of the
departmental chair or dean, as appropriate, and the appeal shall follow
the normal procedures. When a student appeals a grade, the burden of proof
rests with the student. All documents relevant to the appeal shall be
filed in the office of the department involved in the grade appeal. Failure
on the student’s part to complete any step of the procedure within
the specified time period
shall result in the termination of the appeal and the student shall have
no further
recourse under these procedures. Correspondence with the student and the
instructor involved in a grade appeal shall be delivered by certified
mail. |
| 11. |
Withdrawal.
Students who wish to withdraw from the institution before the end of the
semester must make formal written application in the Office of Student Affairs.
Those who complete withdrawal procedures will receive a grade of W in all
courses if official withdrawal is within the period for dropping a course
without a failing grade, they will receive a grade of W in courses they
are passing and a grade of WF in courses they are failing if official withdrawal
is after the last date for dropping a course without a failing grade.
Those who
fail to complete withdrawal procedures will receive a grade of F in each
course for
which they are registered. Refunds which may be due will depend upon the
date of formal
withdrawal. Applications for withdrawal will not be considered if received
after final examinations
begin in any semester. Students planning to re-enroll should apply for
readmission
at least 15 days prior to registration. Students withdrawing from summer
term do
not need to reapply if they plan to re-enroll in the fall. The refund
policies for the University
can be found in the Schedule of Classes Bulletin. Students who have been
charged
with academic misconduct may not be allowed to withdraw.
In the summer
term, if a grade has been earned during any of the sessions, the withdrawal
will be treated as a drop of a course rather than withdrawal so that the
grade earned will not be voided by the withdrawal. If withdrawal has been
processed in the summer term and
the student wishes to register for a later summer session, the student
must go to the Office
of Student Affairs and request that the withdrawal be voided.
|
|