|
While millions of his native countrymen in Bangladesh suffer from
arsenic poisoning in their drinking water, Faisal Hossain works
to find an efficient and affordable solution to manage the crisis.
Arsenic, the "king of poisons" slipped
to royalty throughout the ages, now poses a grave danger to at least
half of the rural population of Bangladesh and other countries with
similar geology, such as India, Vietnam, Cambodia and Mexico.
"We are working on borrowed time," says
Hossain, assistant professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
"We must accelerate priority testing of the rural drinking
water system in order to reduce the risk that arsenic poses to villagers."
About 50 to 60 million people in Bangladesh are
exposed to toxic levels of arsenic through water drawn from shallow
wells. Hossain says there could be as many as 20 million wells in
the rural countryside, making it virtually impossible to test every
well comprehensively because of the time and money involved.
Arsenic in the wells' water is largely the result
of minerals dissolving from weathered rocks and soils. In the 1960s,
farmers and villagers began drilling shallow wells, which were cheaper
but more susceptible to arsenic buildup, after the government encouraged
a switch from surface water to ground water for drinking.
In the early '90s, the poisoning reached epidemic
scale and continues to worsen. According to the World Health Organization,
long-term exposure to arsenic via drinking water causes cancer of
the skin, lungs, bladder and kidneys, as well as skin changes such
as pigmentation abnormalities and hyperkeratosis, a thickening of
the skin.
Hossain and colleagues at the University of Connecticut,
University of California-Davis, and Bangladesh's Rajshahi University
and Engineering University have set a goal to devise an efficient
and low-cost way to identify and shut down unsafe wells.
Testing wells is expensive and time-consuming;
accurate testing requires that each sample be sent to a quality
environmental lab equipped with an expensive atomic absorption spectrophotometer.
The government has opted instead to test wells by inexpensive hand-held
kits (each costing about $1 and requiring 30 minutes of testing
time). These kits, however, tend to have large errors in reporting
the results.
"For one particular brand, we observed that
the kit had only a 10 percent chance of correctly detecting a safe
well," says Hossain. "This means that 90 percent of the
time the villagers use the kit they are likely to get the false
impression of an unsafe well being safe. It’s akin to an HIV-infected
person testing negative and being told not to worry anymore."
The rampant and large-scale use of such kits without
knowledge of their reliability is alarming not just for Bangladesh,
but for other developing countries considering these inexpensive
devices to manage their arsenic problem.
"Another issue currently overlooked by researchers
is the need to propose solutions that fit into the social fabric
of how rural people collect water," he says. "Recent social
studies indicate that villagers would rather travel far away once
a day to collect their daily requirement of safe drinking water
than be burdened with a water treatment system that is difficult
to maintain."
Hossain and his colleagues are currently working
on an adaptive model that can pick up patterns on how the arsenic
varies so that only a few wells have to be accurately tested in
order to predict if others are safe or unsafe. The group employs
two sister theories, chaos and fractals, which some researchers
doubt can be applied to this problem.
"Even though the patterns may seem random
at first sight, mother nature often times has a tendency to repeat
itself on the basis of a ‘code’ that lurks behind this
apparent randomness – the order hidden in randomness is called
'chaos,'" says Hossain. "The theory of chaos means that
once the code is identified, we should be able to look at a relatively
fewer number of accurately tested wells and be able to improve prediction
of well characteristics on a larger collection of untested wells.
"Think of a head of cauliflower," he
says. "You pull one section out and it looks very much like
a small version of the next larger section and the same all the
way to the whole. This describes the phenomenon called 'fractals.'
We learn about the whole by studying the smaller sections. By flagging
a safe cluster of wells, or by shutting down unsafe clusters, we
can provide villagers a rapid, and socially and financially more
convenient choice to travel to safe wells.
“Our recent work has revealed that it is
indeed possible to connect the theory of chaos to improve prediction
characteristics of untested wells. This is probably something that
the scientific community has not witnessed up to now as far as the
arsenic problem is concerned."
Hossain will present his team’s recent
findings at the American Geophysical Union Meeting next month in
San Francisco — a much-anticipated event for he and his peers.
“Such results are always bound to raise
a few eyebrows among skeptics and believers of chaos theory alike,"
Hossain says, chuckling.
While a large portion of the rural population
continues to suffer from the arsenic calamity, Hossain firmly believes
that the more fortunate people — those with time to brainstorm
and drink arsenic-free water — have the responsibility to
critically assess any novel approach until a long-term structural
solution is found for Bangladesh.
|